VP9 vs AV1: Both are open-source Google-backed codecs. AV1 is the successor to VP9, offering 30% better compression but much slower encoding.
Percentage is applied to the original file size.
| Category | VP9 | AV1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| File Size | Small - similar to H.265 | Very small - 30% smaller than VP9 | AV1 |
| Encoding Speed | Slow - 5-10x slower than H.264 | Very slow - 50-100x slower than H.264 | VP9 |
| Maturity | Mature - stable and widely used | Newer - still improving rapidly | VP9 |
| Compatibility | Good browser support | Limited - newest browsers/devices only | VP9 |
| Quality | Excellent | Excellent - marginally better | AV1 |
AV1 is generally better for most users, but both have their place depending on your needs.
AV1 is generally better for most users, but VP9 has advantages in specific scenarios. Use VP9 for immediate web streaming needs.
The key differences are: File Size - VP9: Small - similar to H.265, AV1: Very small - 30% smaller than VP9; Encoding Speed - VP9: Slow - 5-10x slower than H.264, AV1: Very slow - 50-100x slower than H.264.
Yes! Upload your video in either format, select the output format you want, and compress. The conversion happens locally in your browser with no uploads.
For file size: AV1 is better. Very small - 30% smaller than VP9.